Mediev-L: Re: About Infinity There are other systems besides cantor's of different kinds of infinities, for exampleone introduced around the same time Cantor put forth his version, by an http://www.ku.edu/~medieval/melcher/matthias/t98/0084.html
Bounded Infinities I've got ideas of bound infinities, sets whose elements are bound abstraction processes Figments - Semiotics - perfect language - cantor's paradox - Chaotic http://homepages.which.net/~gk.sherman/baaaaaaa.htm
Infinity: You Can't Get There From Here -- Platonic Realms MiniText that, after all, countable infinities are the only kind of infinities there are kindof proof, which has come to be called “cantor's diagonalization argument http://www.mathacademy.com/pr/minitext/infinity/index.asp
Cantor's Conjecture infinities. But all these definitions and their considerations are beautiful (butquite empty) words having no legitimate attitude to mathematics. cantor's http://www.ontologystream.com/beads/Cantor/Zenkin/bead1.htm
Visual Inspection And Sense Analysis Of Data popular form. It is proved that the main G.cantor's Theorem as tothe existence of different infinities is wrong. So, all modern http://www.ontologystream.com/beads/visad/bead1-1.htm
The Continuum Hypothesis There were others, such as David Hilbert, Ernst Zermelo and Leibniz, that wouldgo on to show that cantor's higher infinities are in fact necessary for http://www.math.rutgers.edu/courses/436/436-s00/Papers2000/brazza.html
6.2 Finite Or Infinite? in the philosophy of mathematics itself to reject cantor's assumptions, most Thesearguments tie together the problems of natural and mathematical infinities. http://www.generativescience.org/books/pnb/node24.html
Spicerack.sr.unh.edu/~dvf/Pathways/inf to difficult problems before they developed careful rules for manipulating infinities. Theelaboration of cantor's ideas becomes a major theme of mathematics http://spicerack.sr.unh.edu/~dvf/Pathways/inf
The Power Set consisitent until you have an infinite number of infinities embedded in infinities. upwith a number system that looks an awful like cantor's cardinal numbers. http://descmath.com/diag/power.html
Rich Theory of a rich infinity, I think you would find that cantor's transfinite numbers It simplyshows that Galileo's conjecture that all infinities are the same size http://descmath.com/diag/rich.html
BBC - Radio 4 - 5 Numbers - Infinity The result, confusing though it may seem, is that some infinities are bigger thanothers! cantor's work represented a threat to the entrenched complacency of http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/5numbers5.shtml
Search AZ Directory Contacting People About Us No First Order axiomatization, then, can categorically describe a systemwhose size is one of cantor's higher infinities. (Systems http://www.philosophy.unimelb.edu.au/handouts/161016/tennant.html
LA Weekly: Columns: Quark Soup: To Infinity And Beyond has led to the discovery of numbers that dwarf even cantor's remotest dreams Theclasses of infinities now under study sound indeed like refugees from Lewis http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/16/quark-wertheim.php
Certainty, Infinity, Impossibility Key ideas Numbers, The Pythagoreans and the irrationality of 2 , ordersof infinities, cantor's diagonalization argument, R = R n ; n=2, 3 http://cs.wwc.edu/~aabyan/CII/book.html
CII Paper Key ideas The Pythagoreans and the irrationality of 2 , orders of infinities,cantor's diagonalization argument, R = R n ; n=2, 3, , describability. http://cs.wwc.edu/~aabyan/CII/paperCII.html
4.06: PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS -- Logic And Computational Theory research over the years indicates that these peculiar infinities are firmly Oneof the most successful attempts used cantor's original conceptual framework http://www.imprint-academic.demon.co.uk/SPECIAL/04_06.html
EMail Msg <9305050249.AA05043@turing.pacss.binghamton.edu> I agree, analysis does not explicitly depend on cantor's construction, but I havea preference for avoiding talk about completed infinities unless absolutely http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/email-archives/interlingua.messages/310.html
EMail Msg <9305241234.AA14945@turing.pacss.binghamton.edu> does seem to lead to the dreaded swamp of confusions or cantor's paradise Therefore,I believe that talk of countable infinities in foundational studies is OK http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/email-archives/interlingua.messages/338.html